Texting riders legally: TCPA consent rules for NEMT reminders
Automated ride reminder texts and prerecorded calls to cell phones need the rider's prior express consent under the TCPA, which a rider gives by providing the number for ride updates. Marketing texts need signed written consent. Honor any reasonable opt-out, including replies like STOP or cancel, within 10 business days at most, and record who agreed, when, and to what.
On this page
Which rider messages the TCPA covers
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s consent rules apply to calls placed with an autodialer or an artificial or prerecorded voice, and the FCC treats a text message as a call. A dispatcher who dials one rider by hand is outside those rules. The case to plan for is a system that sends reminder texts on a schedule.
Two Supreme Court decisions shape how far the rules reach:
- Facebook v. Duguid (April 1, 2021). The Court limited the autodialer definition to equipment with the capacity to store or produce numbers using a random or sequential number generator. A system that texts numbers from your rider list may fall outside that definition. The prerecorded voice rule has no such limit, and state laws define automated systems in their own words.
- McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson (June 20, 2025). District courts hearing TCPA enforcement suits are not bound by the FCC’s interpretation of the statute. FCC orders still carry weight, but a judge may read the law differently.
Consent is the one defense that holds up however a court answers either question. It is also cheap compared with the alternative. Under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(3), a person can sue for actual losses or $500 per violation, whichever is greater, and a court may triple the award for willful or knowing violations. As an example, 40 riders who never agreed to texts, each sent 10 automated reminders, add up to 400 violations and $200,000 at the statutory minimum.
What each type of message needs
The consent you need depends on the channel and on whether the message sells anything.
| Message | Consent needed | Rule in 47 CFR 64.1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Dispatcher calls or texts a rider by hand | None under the robocall rules | (a)(1) covers autodialed and prerecorded calls only |
| Automated reminder text or prerecorded call to a cell phone | Prior express consent, unless the health care exemption fits | (a)(1)(iii) and (a)(9)(iv) |
| Prerecorded reminder call to a home landline, no advertising | None for up to three calls in any 30 days; health care messages sent by a HIPAA covered entity or its business associate, one per day and three per week at most. More than that needs prior express consent | (a)(3)(iii) and (a)(3)(v) |
| Automated text or prerecorded call promoting a service, such as private-pay rides | Prior express written consent | (a)(2) |
Prior express consent can be oral. It usually exists when a rider knowingly gives you a number so you can reach them about rides.
Prior express written consent is stricter. Under (f)(9) it is a written agreement signed by the person, with electronic signatures valid where federal or state law recognizes them. It names the number, authorizes automated marketing calls or texts, and says signing is not a condition of buying anything.
That line decides which consent you need. “Your pickup is tomorrow at 9:15 AM” is informational. The same text with “Book your next ride and save 10 percent” added becomes telemarketing, and reminder consent does not cover it.
Who can give consent
Consent belongs to the person who receives the messages, and it has to come from that person or someone the rules allow to act for them.
- The rider. The FCC’s 2015 order treats a patient who hands a phone number to a healthcare provider as agreeing to healthcare calls covered by HIPAA from that provider and the business associates working for it, as long as the calls stay within what the patient agreed to and the patient has not said otherwise.
- A broker or facility, only as a messenger. The FCC has said an intermediary may convey consent the person actually gave but cannot give consent for them. A number on a broker manifest tells you where to reach the rider. It does not prove the rider agreed to automated texts from your company.
- A caregiver, during medical incapacity. The same 2015 order lets a third party consent to healthcare calls when the patient cannot consent because of medical incapacity. That consent ends once the patient can decide for themselves.
- A family member, for their own phone. A daughter who manages her father’s dialysis rides can agree to get the texts at her number. Her consent covers her number, not his.
Numbers change hands. When a rider’s number is reassigned, the new owner never agreed to anything. Section 64.1200(m) gives a safe harbor to a caller who checked the FCC’s reassigned numbers database and got a wrong “no” answer, and the caller carries the burden of proving it. The everyday fix is simpler: when a reply says “wrong number” or “who is this”, stop texting that number and correct the rider’s profile the same day.
The health care exemption and its limits
Section 64.1200(a)(9)(iv) lets healthcare providers text or call cell phones without prior express consent, but only when every message meets every condition:
- It is free to the recipient and does not count against their plan limits.
- It goes only to the wireless number the patient provided.
- It states the provider’s name and contact information.
- Its purpose is on the list: appointment and exam confirmations and reminders, wellness checkups, hospital pre-registration instructions, pre-operative instructions, lab results, post-discharge follow-up intended to prevent readmission, prescription notifications, or home healthcare instructions.
- It contains no telemarketing, solicitation, or advertising, and no billing, debt-collection, or other financial content.
- A voice message runs about a minute or less, and a text stays at 160 characters or less.
- A patient receives at most one message per day, and three in any week.
- Each message offers an easy opt-out. For texts, replying STOP is the exclusive way to opt out.
- Opt-outs are honored immediately.
A transportation company should treat this as a backstop, not a plan. The FCC wrote the exemption for healthcare providers and limited it to messages with a healthcare treatment purpose, and a pickup reminder does not appear on the purpose list word for word. After McKesson, a court can decide for itself whether a ride reminder counts.
The weekly cap is also easy to break. A rider with appointments on Tuesday and Thursday who gets a booking confirmation, a day-before reminder, and an on-the-way text for each ride receives six messages that week, double the limit. And a text mentioning a copay or an unpaid balance fails condition 5. Consent collected at booking covers all of those messages without any of these arguments.
Opt-outs under the current rules
The FCC’s revocation rules, adopted in 2024, took effect on April 11, 2025, except for one piece. The rules in force on September 30, 2026:
- Any reasonable way of saying no counts. Seven reply words end consent on their own: stop, quit, end, revoke, opt out, cancel, and unsubscribe. Other wording counts too when a reasonable reader would take it as a wish to stop getting messages.
- You may not name one exclusive way to opt out.
- You have a reasonable time to act on the request, capped at 10 business days from receipt.
- A request made another way, such as a voicemail or an email to the office, creates a rebuttable presumption that consent is revoked.
- If your texts come from a number that cannot receive replies, each text must say so and list the other ways to opt out.
The delayed piece is the “revoke-all” requirement. It would make an opt-out sent in response to one type of informational message cover all of a caller’s robocalls and robotexts on unrelated matters. The FCC’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau pushed its effective date to January 31, 2027 in Order DA 26-12 (January 6, 2026).
More change is on the table. A draft order released September 9, 2026 (FCC-CIRC 2609-05) and set for a vote at the Commission’s September 30, 2026 meeting would let a caller treat an opt-out from one category of informational message as covering only that category. It would also let a caller name one exclusive opt-out method, such as replying with one of the seven words, as long as every call or text discloses it. Those changes would take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and replace the January 31, 2027 date. Check the adopted text before you change your opt-out process.
For an NEMT company, one approach works under any version of the rule. When a rider opts out, stop every automated text and call to that number, and let a dispatcher call by hand when a ride needs attention. The rule allows one confirmation text with no marketing in it, and a confirmation sent within five minutes is presumed to fall within the rider’s consent (64.1200(a)(12)). CTIA’s industry guidelines also call for one final opt-out confirmation.
A rider who replies “cancel” to cancel one ride has, under the rule, opted out of your texts. Offer a different reply for ride cancellations, a trap the ride reminders guide covers in detail.
Quiet hours and state telemarketing laws
Federal quiet hours cover sales calls, not reminders. Section 64.1200(c)(1) bars telephone solicitations before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. at the called party’s location, and a telephone solicitation is a call or message meant to encourage a purchase. A pickup reminder does not qualify.
A sending window still makes sense. Schedule day-before reminders between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. in the rider’s time zone. Send time-critical texts, such as an on-the-way notice for a 5:30 a.m. dialysis pickup, only when the driver is actually heading there.
Some states add their own rules for sales calls and texts, with tighter hours and their own lawsuits. Two examples:
| State | What it covers | Hours and limits | Lawsuits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida (Fla. Stat. 501.059 and 501.616) | Telephonic sales calls, defined to include texts and voicemails sent to solicit a sale; automated unsolicited sales calls need prior express written consent (calls to people with a prior or existing business relationship are not “unsolicited” under 501.059) | Commercial solicitation calls only from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. local time, and no more than three in 24 hours on the same subject | Actual damages or $500, whichever is greater, up to triple if willful. For texts, the recipient must first reply STOP and give the sender 15 days |
| Maryland (Com. Law 14-4502 and 14-4503) | Telephone solicitations; automated dialing or recorded messages need prior express written consent | None between 8 p.m. and 8 a.m.; no more than three in 24 hours on the same subject | Actual damages or up to $500, whichever is greater, up to triple if willful; a call to a Maryland area code is presumed to reach a Maryland resident |
These laws aim at selling. They come into play when an NEMT company texts riders about private-pay service, a new wheelchair van, or a referral reward, and the federal written consent rule for automated marketing texts applies on top of them. Keep every reminder free of sales lines and it stays on the informational side of these rules.
Consent wording at intake
Ask the same question on every booking and store the answer where every dispatcher can see it. The trip intake guide and the trip request form show where it fits in the call.
A phone script the dispatcher reads word for word:
“We text a reminder the day before your ride and again when your driver is on the way. Can we text you about your rides at this number? Message and data rates may apply, and you can reply STOP at any time to end the texts.”
On an online booking form, use an unchecked box beside the phone field: “Text me ride reminders and driver updates at this number. Reply STOP to end texts.” If you also want to send marketing texts, add a second unchecked box with the written consent disclosures from 64.1200(f)(9), and never make it a condition of booking.
CTIA’s guidelines list what to keep for each opt-in. Adapted to a ride booking:
| Record | Example |
|---|---|
| Date and time of consent | September 30, 2026, 10:14 AM |
| Phone number consented | The number read back to the caller |
| Who agreed | The rider, or the daughter who manages rides at her own number |
| How consent was given | Phone booking, online form, or paper form |
| Exact wording used | “Phone script, version 3” |
| What they agreed to | Ride reminders and driver updates |
| Language | Spanish |
| Who took it | Dispatcher’s name or initials |
After a rider opts in, the first text should confirm the enrollment. CTIA’s guidelines call for the program name, a way to get help, how to opt out, a note that messages recur and how often, and any charges. Ask again whenever a rider gives a new number, and treat any number that arrives on a broker file as unconfirmed until the first call.
Reminder texts in HealthRide
HealthRide can text riders the day before and again shortly before pickup. The texts can include a link that shows the driver’s estimated arrival. Those are the automated messages this guide covers, so the consent question belongs in every booking. The live map page shows what riders and facilities see.
Frequently asked questions
- Does a dispatcher need TCPA consent to call a rider by hand?
- No, not under the robocall rules. The consent requirement in 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(1) applies to calls made with an autodialer or an artificial or prerecorded voice, and texts sent the same way. A person dialing one rider about one ride falls outside it. Sales calls are a separate matter: the Do Not Call and quiet-hours rules still apply to a dispatcher phoning past riders to sell private-pay service.
- Can I send automated texts to a phone number a broker gave me?
- Only if the rider gave consent that reached you through the broker. The FCC has said an intermediary can pass along consent the person actually gave, but it cannot consent on the person's behalf. A number on a trip manifest shows how to reach the rider, not what the rider agreed to. Confirm texting on your first call with a new rider and record the answer.
- Do ride reminder texts qualify for the TCPA health care exemption?
- Possibly, but it is weak ground. The exemption in 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(9)(iv) covers messages by or on behalf of healthcare providers for listed purposes such as appointment confirmations and reminders, limited to one message per day and three per week, 160 characters per text, with STOP as the opt-out. A pickup reminder is not on the list word for word, and since 2025 district courts hearing these suits do not have to follow the FCC's reading of the statute. Consent collected at booking avoids the question.
- Can a family member agree to ride texts for a rider?
- Yes, in two ways. A family member can agree to get ride texts at their own number, because consent belongs to the person who receives the messages. And when a rider cannot consent because of medical incapacity, the FCC allows a third party to consent to healthcare calls for the rider, but only while the incapacity lasts.
- After a rider opts out, how quickly must the texts stop?
- Within a reasonable time and no later than 10 business days after the request, under 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(10). Messages sent under the health care exemption must stop immediately. There is no reason to use the full window: stop automated texts to that number at once, send one confirmation, and note the opt-out where every dispatcher can see it.
- Do the 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. quiet hours apply to ride reminders?
- The federal quiet hours in 47 CFR 64.1200(c)(1) apply to telephone solicitations, meaning calls or texts meant to sell something, so a plain pickup reminder falls outside them. Florida and Maryland limit sales calls to 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Sending routine reminders inside that narrower window keeps you clear of both and spares riders a late-night buzz.
- What consent do I need to text past riders about private-pay rides?
- Prior express written consent, if the texts are automated. That is a signed agreement, electronic signatures included, that names the phone number, authorizes marketing texts or calls, and states that signing is not a condition of getting service (47 CFR 64.1200(f)(9)). Consent a rider gave for ride reminders does not extend to marketing.